Friday, March 25, 2011

Former Redskin Frank Grant Offers Fitness Lesson from Back in the Day


Former Redskins wide receiver Frank Grant

The state of affairs in the National Football League (NFL) will affect more than the financial health of professional football players. We really have no idea when the league will get it together and work out a new Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA). Even after the two sides reach an agreement, players will have lost valuable time in the team weight rooms and on the fields with their teammates. How will they stay in the specific physical shape required to play the game well?
Were there no lockout going on, many professional players would already be gearing up for formal team strength and conditioning programs/organized team activities (OTAs) or receiving injury treatment or rehab by trainers or team doctors.
Several football players have said that they will continue working out until a CBA is in place. I applaud them. They may use this time of uncertainty to organize workouts with teammates and personal trainers while they are not allowed into their team facilities. (Of course, professional athletes, even during down-time, are 95% more fit than the average American!) But I can’t see how these athletes can become as football-ready as they would if they were in a formal team environment.
Serious formal emphasis on fitness during the off-season was not always the case in the NFL. I spoke recently to former Washington Redskin Frank Grant, a wide receiver for the team from 1972 through 1977, about the training of professional football players in general and we began talking about what the fitness training was like “back in the day.”
“Even when I went to college there was little to know about weight training whatsoever,” Grant said. “In preseason or before the season, we might jog a couple of miles and think that would keep us in shape for the season. There was no regular or consistent weight training system. As a matter of fact, my school had one Universal Gym. We’d go in after practice and kind of do whatever we thought we should do. No one knew anything about how many reps to do, or circular training … you kind of did what you came up with.”
Grant was drafted by the Redskins out of Colorado State University-Pueblo (known at the time as Southern Colorado State College) in the 1972 NFL Draft by then head Coach George Allen (one of the few draft picks Allen didn’t trade away for a veteran!). He told me that the real reason he was in any shape at all going into the July training camp that first season was because he, being a track & field star at CSU, had just finished the track & field season when he was drafted.
Going into a team mostly made up of the “Over-the-Hill-Gang” - a bunch of wily veterans like Diron Talbert, Ron McDole, Speedy Duncan, Richie Petibon, Jack Pardee, Charley Taylor, Roy Jefferson, Billy Kilmer and Sonny Jurgenson (who was 38 at the time) - Grant was a rookie in every sense of the word. But he was lucky enough to come into the league in decent shape from his track & field season.
“The one thing I brought from college - I’d run two years of track when I came to the Redskins,” he said. “I had just left the track circuit. My last track meet was the latter part of June and training camp started in July. I was really in good shape when I got to camp having run track for the previous five or six months.
“When I got to the professional level with the Redskins, most of the guys at that time were older ball players and it was kind of relaxed in regard to training. George Allen had traded for a bunch of veterans and there wasn’t a lot of emphasis on weight training.  Not [many] ball players in the Redskins had [lifted weights] at all. They’d come up doing it their way. I mean, my rookie year, we’d do a little bit of this and a little bit of that. And most of the older guys, they’d think, ‘Well, I’m already in the pro level. What the hell do I need to do all this other stuff for? What’s it going to do for me now?’”
It wasn’t until a few years after Grant’s rookie year with Washington that the idea of team-wide fitness training came to Ashburn.
“It was my second or third year when the Pittsburgh Steelers won the Superbowl,” Grant explained, “and one of the things that the Steelers attributed their success that year to was an off-season weight training program. Even being the stickler that George Allen was, he was not opposed to hearing someone else’s road or way to success and applying it to his program. He immediately applied a weight training program [to the team]. He brought in trainers and instructors to develop a training regimen and schedule for the ball players.”
However, getting the team to the next fitness level wasn’t going to be as easy as writing up a schedule.
“I was a rookie. Now unfortunately, for a lot of the vets at that time; the older guys who had grown up without that type of system, they never got the right type of training. What they’d do – after practice they’d go in and put on [the weight that] they thought they could lift and they’d get in there and…,” (Frank starts growling and imitating lifting motions here) “…they’d do a couple of reps and leave because they considered that was what their workout was going to be.”
“We had a couple of guys throw their backs out trying to do squats,” Grant continued, “which they’d never done before. We had several injuries due to the fact that they were trying to get into lifting weights, which is something that George Allen was now requiring.
“We had something that was supposed to be good turn into something bad for some people who just didn’t understand how to do what was expected of them.”
I had to question where the trainers were during these ‘workouts’ and the answer illustrates how far the league – all of society, in fact – has come with regard to the specifics of how to use the equipment and the techniques to gain strength and conditioning. The trainers were there…. they just did not know what they know today.
“There were trainers [that] were still learning themselves,” Grant said. “There were trainers there insisting that, ‘Yeah, I can tape your ankles… Yeah, I can tape your knees… I can tape your shoulders… all that kind of stuff. But they weren’t trained in regards to giving you an outline or a detailed weight training program and most of the guys were already older guys –trying to start at the maximum weight because they didn’t want to take the time to build up [their strength] by [starting with] light weight and then [moving up] to the heavy weights.  They wanted to start out with the heavy weights so they could say ‘I’m just gonna do three sets of this and then leave.’ That led to torn muscles, bad backs and other ailments.”
This early attempt at weight-training, combined with the lack of better uniform equipment, different rules and a different mentality, might certainly have contributed to the physical ailments that many retired players are dealing with now. These conditions, in turn, have contributed to one of the issues that is being negotiated today by the NFL and NFLPA into the new CBA: that of long-term health insurance and benefits for both current and retired players.
While many NFL players will continue to work hard during the lockout, I am concerned that a CBA may not get negotiated in time for them to receive an adequate amount or the right kind of strength and conditioning training before the season begins. If the negotiations go on too long, OTAs, mini-camps and training camps will be so shortened before the regular season begins, that players will not be in the necessary shape to play the game without undue injury. It is not unimaginable that they will be rushed onto the field for the first game of the season, no matter how much or how little strength and conditioning training they have been able to participate in. This is risky. And I haven't even begun to discuss what how it might affect the quality of the game.
Grant’s stories illustrate how important the off-season strength and conditioning is to the players and, if the NFL can’t do something about getting a CBA negotiated in a reasonable amount of time, these athletes will suffer physically as well as financially.

POLL: How Should the Redskins Handle the Quarterback Position in 2011?


Donovan McNabb should remain
the Redskins starting QB in 2011
The Washington Redskins are going into their second year under the regime of General Manager Bruce Allen and head coach Mike Shanahan and, while I knew that the team had gone through a lot of signal callers over the years, I have never stopped to count. I was surprised to find the number was so high. Dan Daly ofThe Washington Times pointed out in an article today that the Redskins have had 17 quarterbacks in the last 17 years. His question, therefore, pertaining to this-coming season of "will 18 be the lucky number?" is a relevant one. Personally, I'd like the number to stay at 17 because this would mean that Donovan McNabb would remain the team's quarter back. But...
17 quarterbacks in 17 years. Wow.
McNabb hardly got a fair shake last season. After Shanahan said over and over that learning a new system is like learning a new language, the head coach and son/offensive coordinator Kyle gave McNabb less than one season to learn this new "language."
Backup quarterback Rex Grossman called the signals in the last games of the season and third string quarterback John Beck is still under contract. With the 10th pick in the draft, there have been mock drafts and predictions of any number of college players that Allen and Shanahan could pick, some of which have been quarterbacks and some of which have been offensive/defensive linemen and/or wide receivers.
Obviously, only those on the inside know what this team is going to do about the most important position on the field, whether it's through the draft or, if/when it hopefully arrives, free agency.
There are many different opinions out there. I'd like to know what YOU think should happen at the Washington Redskins quarterback position in 2011.



Monday, March 14, 2011

NFL CBA Negotiations: Figuring Out Who Has Done What – Or Not

Vonnie Holliday: Redskins' NFLPA
representative
The letters from the NFL and the NFLPA to the fans explaining what happened in the CBA negotiations are nice gestures and I’m sure they have nothing to do with public relations (ouch… that tooth is sharp!). Trying to figure out where the disconnect between the two parties occurred based on these letters is close to impossible, however. All I can say is that either they are each speaking entirely different languages, or somebody is not telling the truth.
In the NFL letter (one version is posted on Redskins.com), they sound like a very reasonable, if not victimized group. The NFLPA, who dismantled their official website during this situation, is releasing their information through nfllockout.com, and they sound wounded as well.
Paragraph by paragraph, I went through the two letters, trying to compare the issues they discuss. Unfortunately, it was like comparing artichokes to bananas or squash to jalapeno peppers. It would have been nice if each issue had been addressed point-by-point for the reader.
Here is some of what they wrote:
NFL: “The union was offered financial disclosure of audited league and club profitability information that is not even shared with the NFL clubs”
NFLPA: “The NFL’s offer on March 7 to give the NFLPA a single sheet of numbers was NOT financial disclosure. The players’ accountants and bankers advised that the “offered” information was meaningless: only two numbers for each year.  The NFL demanded a multi-billion dollar give back and refused to provide any legitimate financial information to justify it.”
***********************
NFL: “It included an offer to narrow the player compensation gap that existed in the negotiations by splitting the difference…”  “ …the clubs offered a deal that would have had no adverse financial impact upon veteran players in the early years and would meet the players’ financial demands in the latter years.”
NFLPA: NFL demanded 100% of all revenues which went above unrealistically low projections for the first four years.  The NFL demanded a multi-billion dollar giveback…” “…The NFL offered no proposal at all for long-term share of revenues “
***********************
NFL: “…guarantee[d] reallocation of savings from first-round rookies to veterans and retirees without negatively affecting compensation for rounds 2-7; ensure no compensation reduction for veterans…”
NFLPA:  “The NFL wanted to turn the clock back on player compensation by four years, moving them back to where they were in 2007.”
***********************
NFL:   “…implement new year-round health and safety rules…”
NFLPA:  “The NFL refused to meet the players on significant changes to in-season, off-season or pre-season health and safety rules.”
***********************
NFL:    “…retain the current 16-4 season format for at least two years with any subsequent changes subject to the approval of the league and union…”
NFLPA: The NFL kept on the table its hypocritical demand for an 18-game season, despite its public claims to be working toward improving the health and safety of players.”
I was under the impression that some of these things had been worked out; like the safety issues, the decision to stay with a 16-4 season format and a rookie wage scale. Obviously I was wrong.
The biggest problem for John Q. Public in all of this is that we are not being given all of the information available.  The letter to the fans from the NFL certainly will only tell their side of the story. And, as much as I am in the NFLPA’s corner, I am sure there is information they are not releasing either, not necessarily because they are pulling a con but more because it is in their best interest not to do so at this point. This is likely the case with both parties. But then why bother to pacify the public with letters that don’t mean much?
The two documents obviously summarized, simplified, abridged, condensed, reduced and compressed (or any other term that could be used) the issues and we, the public, are not getting the whole story.
You know, at this point, that’s just as well. We are likely to be in this position for a while; waiting while the court system gears up for litigation on anti-trust issues between the players and the owners, while players figure out how to deal with the lockout and their attorneys get moving on that whole issue.  Since we, the fans, will likely never get all of the facts regarding the negotiations – or know exactly why they failed – we might has well do something else for a while rather than wrack our brains trying to make sense of it all.
It’s a nice day today. I just might go fishing.
Hail.

Thursday, March 10, 2011

NFL CBA: 18-Game Season, Rookie Wage Scale Was the Easy Stuff

It is an unfortunate human failing that a full pocketbook often groans more loudly than an empty stomach. ~Franklin Delano Roosevelt
The National Football League owners conceded this week to keeping the same number of regular season games - 16 as opposed to 18 – but still have not agreed to fully show the NFL Players Association (NFLPA) what their finances are all about. It appears that the game schedule concession was easy by comparison to getting the owners to open their check book ledgers.

So far, the a couple of the well-publicized key points that had kept the two sides apart were a rookie wage scale, decisions about changing to an eighteen-game season and player benefits, just to name a few. But these issues are nothing compared to the issues of the revenue splits between the two sides (in the previous Collective Bargaining Agreement [CBA] players were given a guaranteed percentage of the gross revenues) - which is basically what caused the owners pick this fight in the first place.

Money is like manure. You have to spread it around or it smells. ~J. Paul Getty

In terms of what has already been agreed upon, things make sense.

Should rookies need to at least play in one NFL game before they get paid $50 million? Of course.

Rather than offering six-year, $55 million contracts, the new rookie scale will limit all first-round contracts to four years (down from six for the current top 16 and five for the final 16). In subsequent rounds, the maximum contract terms will be cut down from four to three years, according to am NEW YORK.

Money saved here should be made available for proven veterans who have done the work.

Will Washington Redskins’ fans be packing up tail-gating gear and paying for parking at FEDEX Field for two, rather than four preseason games in 2011? Nope. The NFLPA’s BMOC (big man on campus), DeMaurice Smith has stated that the union will not consider moving to an 18-game schedule in the ongoing negotiations.

"First of all, the league has never presented a formal proposal for 18 games," Smith told Jim Trotter of SI.com. "But more importantly, it's something that our players don't want. Eighteen games is not in the best interest of our players' safety, so we're not doing it."

Money often costs too much. ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson

I don’t have a lot of sympathy for how tired the folks involved in this situation look. The owners and the NFLPA have had two years to talk about the issues keeping a CBA from being agreed upon and it has now come down to the 12th hour. If anyone wants football to be played any time soon, the two sides have until 11:59 pm tomorrow night to figure out how to get a deal done. However, that doesn’t look likely if the locks don’t come off of the NFL owner's financial ledgers.

A major obstacle is the way the revenues are to be split and the NFLPA cannot make an intelligent decision on concessions OR demands without knowing the state of the owners/teams’ finances. What bothers me – and others – is that the owners seem so reluctant to open them. What are they hiding?

Under the old CBA, on top of the $9 billion in revenue, owners received an immediate $1 billion for operating expenses before splitting remaining revenues with players; at the outset of these negotiations, the NFL sought an extra $1 billion off the top.

Recently, the Associated Press reported that the owners had lowered this amount to $800 million. Smith thinks that figure is still too high, that is, at least unless and until the owners give up more financial information. While the owners have given them some, Smith says it isn't enough.

"Just to be absolutely clear, the information that was offered wasn't what we asked for," Smith said, "and, according to our investment bankers and advisers, they told us that information would be meaningless in determining whether to write an $800 million check to the National Football League [in each year of a new CBA].”

Nothing that Smith asked for in a letter to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell written May 18, 2009, asking for specific financial information, was unreasonable. He asked for information on total operating income, expenses, profit, net income and assets. This is the type of information any bank would want from someone wanting investment capital to open a business. Are the owners not giving out this information because what will become clear is that they are billionaires wanting to become multi-billionaires and the conspicuous consumption is simply too conspicuous?

While that, in and of itself is not a crime, it is when the parity between what they want and what is fair to concede to their employees – i.e., the players who are making them much of that money - is too great. In the owners’ minds, there are stadiums and practice bubbles to be built and paid for, free agents to pay and jerseys to market. I suppose in their minds, $800 million isn’t enough to get all that done.

On the other hand, players have a short life-span in their field of employment (pun intended) compared to other professions. They would like to make the most of the financial opportunities they have while playing and get themselves and their families ready for life-after-football. What do they need to get it done?

Until this specific issue is resolved, no CBA will get signed. The rookie wage scale, the player benefits and an 18-game season are issues that are negotiable by logic and fact. Issues like the parity between NFL markets – say, Washington or Dallas vs. Atlanta or Arizona – which can affect how much revenue goes to each team and how it is used – is large and it is dynamic. Regional and national economics, game schedules; even win/loss records could – albeit subtly – change requirements.

Money will buy you a pretty good dog, but it won't buy the wag of his tail. ~Henry Wheeler Shaw

The owners are losing this case in the court of public opinion. Being viewed as greedy and unwilling to show their finances, the best thing they could do is open up the books and let Smith and the NFLPA see why the owners are claiming they need or deserve the $800 million dollars…. at least if they want to see football in 2011 and not court litigation.

Despite what NFL lead negotiator Jeff Pash said yesterday about the owners being willing to give the NFLPA more information: “Have we offered to provide more? Absolutely. And is it a subject that we're prepared to discuss? Absolutely," no more information has come out yet - that we know of.

This being the case, these next two days could be very, very long.

In the meantime, I think I’ll go do my taxes.

Intaxication: Euphoria at getting a refund from the IRS, which lasts until you realize it was your money to start with. ~From a Washington Post word contest

Hail.

Saturday, March 5, 2011

Washington Redskins: Losing the Off-Season Means Winning

The Washington Redskins announced yesterday that they had signed former St. Louis Rams safety Oshiomogho "O.J." Atogwe. While the team did not announce the terms of the deal at the time, according to NBCSports, the new Redskin will get $26 million over five years.

This was not a typical off-season procurement for a team more recently known to “win” the off-season with flashy, high-dollar, fantasy-football-type of free agent signings. Can you say Adam Archuleta? Deon Sanders? How about Albert Haynesworth? These signings didn't do much for the team once the season came around. I like to think more along the lines of linebacker London Fletcher.

Since this is the case, give me a losing off-season any day. I’d rather see the team go quietly through the late winter, early spring and summer and come out in September with a bang, thank you very much.

This signing is good news folks, for a couple of reasons.
  • Atogwe was paid a reasonable amount of money. Five-point-two million dollars a year is not unreasonable for a player as accomplished as he is and for a position so important to the team. While the Redskins of the past 10 years would likely have snatched him up as soon as he was released and offered him twice what any other team had even whispered, all of the signs are that head coach Mike Shanahan and General Manager Bruce Allen know the meaning of both patience and moderation. 
  • The safety position was one of need. This team has holes to be filled all over the place but defense is one of the most glaring and safety one of the most important. While the Redskins also desperately need a beast at nose tackle, Washington was ranked 31st in the NFL when the season ended and had not yet identified a true franchise free safety. 
Atogwe left the Rams having recorded 470 tackles, 22 interceptions, 22 forced fumbles, eight fumble recoveries and five sacks. His combined 44 forced fumbles and interceptions since the start of 2006 are

the most in the NFL, while his interception total over that span is tied for the eighth-most in the NFL.

Impressive.

Speaking of fumble recoveries, anyone remember former Redskins guard Pete Kendall’s “moment of regret” when, during a 2008 game against the Rams a (then QB) Jason Campbell pass was deflected? And, after rescuing the ball Kendall tried to run with it rather than just lying down with it? And, while trying to make some yards Kendall was hit by Rams’ linebacker Pisa Tinoisamoa and fumbled the ball himself?

Well, you probably remember then that it was our new safety, Atogwe, who scooped up the fumble and ran it 75 yards into the end zone. That score gave the Rams the lead at half-time and they ultimately won the game 19-17 in one of the most discouraging games the Redskins have played.

  • Signing a free agent safety leaves the draft picks that the team has free to be used on other positions of need. Any similar free agent signings they can work gives them more options during the draft. One of the things I'm looking for from Allen and Shanahan are managing their picks during the draft and getting as much as they can by trading back and forth, etc. Let’s hope they can work some magic in April and find some guys that can make an impact on the team this year. 
  • Atogwe should be fine in the locker room. Redskins defensive coordinator Jim Haslett knows the safety from when Haslett was head coach for the Rams. He obviously feels he will fit in with the team. Atogwe must be a “character guy” because, according to the St. Louis Rams website, he was their defensive team captain. Guys like that generally have no problem becoming comfortable with a new team. 
  • O.J. Atogwe should complement Redskins safety LaRon Landry nicely. With Atogwe carrying the free safety spot, Landry will be able to play the strong safety position where he is oh-so-much-better. Plus, much of the beauty of the 3-4 defense is about the turnovers and Atogwe has certainly proven that he can produce when it comes to takeaways. His signing could bring huge improvements in the turnover ratio of the team. 
If the rest of any free agent signings that the Redskins accomplish are as good as this one, i.e., offering good players a reasonable amount of money; they might finally lose the off-season and become winners once the real games begin. I’ll take that kind of loss any day.

Hail

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

No One Says It Like Former Redskin Clinton Portis

The Washington Redskins announced yesterday that they have released running back Clinton Portis. While I understand the decision, I am torn by it. Many people believe that C.P.’s injuries over the years have left him broken down and no longer a number one back. In my humble opinion, how good the former Miami Hurricane can be has everything to do with how motivated he is. But that is a subject for another discussion.
I am going to miss Clinton Portis… especially his interviews. This is a man who said whatever he felt and, whether politically correct or not, you have to respect a man who sticks with what he believes.
Whatever the subject, no matter what he says; when Portis speaks, people listen. Why? Because of the unique way he has of getting his point across.
Example: In September of 2008, Portis appeared on a weekly ESPN Radio 980AMappearance on the John Thompson Show. During one show, the running back and co-host Brian Mitchell got into it over some things Mitchell had said during some candid analysis which Portis disagreed with. It did not take long for the words to fly, fast and furious. At the time, I had a hard time understanding some of what was said because Portis was appearing via telephone as opposed to being there in the studio.
Fortunately, Dan Steinberg of the Washington Post transcribed part of the interview.
In typical Portis fashion, he became philosophical and laid it out like no one but C.P. can:
“I ain’t found nobody in this city that’s gonna praise me,” he said. “They’re gonna hold me in the fire and everything. I don’t mind going into the fire, I don’t mind burning, because when I come out I’m gonna throw some water on me and I’m gonna cool everybody off. I don’t never pay attention to that.”
In another part of the interview, Portis made this highly published comment:
“This is what I’m gonna tell you about Portis: Portis pocket’s straight, my man, my pocket’s gonna stay straight.”
Clinton Portis… ya gotta love him.
I enjoyed listening to the Pro Bowler so much that I went looking for “Portispeak.” Thank you, Dan Steinberg, for providing much of it!
I found some great quotes, both from his time in Denver and from his time here in Washington. See if you remember any of it as well.
About his groin injury last October:
“I didn’t even know the groin could be up this high. You know, I never imagined that a groin would even be up this high. So I’m learning on it.”
“I didn’t get my hair styled today. I actually stuck my hand in a socket and this is the way it turned out.”
On his and former back-up quarterback up Colt McCoy’s plan to swim with sharks in their leisure time:
“I mean, I’m going to be in a cage! If a shark bites through the cage and they can’t pull me up in time, I deserved it, boy.”
“And I mean, you put a woman and you give her a choice of 53 athletes, somebody got to be appealing to her. You know, somebody got to spark her interest, or she’s gonna want somebody. I don’t know what kind of woman won’t, if you get to go and look at 53 men’s packages. And you’re just sitting here, saying ‘Oh, none of this is attractive to me.’ I know you’re doing a job, but at the same time, the same way I’m gonna cut my eye if I see somebody worth talking to, I’m sure they do the same thing.”
“You know, he’s still the same man that you grew to love.  I mean, he kept it on wraps.  For any man to be able to keep that on wrap for that long, to keep his business [private].  I’m sure this wasn’t the first time his wife found out he was probably with somebody else, but it was always hidden, it wasn’t in the public eye, it wasn’t pressure for her to leave him, there wasn’t pressure to ruin their home.  I’m sure they got into it before. I doubt that this is the first time she picked up his phone and seen another woman had called him.”
On going to the Pro Bowl after saying he was taking time off until March to relax:
“Damn, I forgot I’ve got to go over there,” he said. “Oh yeah, I’ll go over there….I forgot all about the Pro Bowl. They give you a week to get ready, so I’ll be all right.”
On being benched by then head coach Jim Zorn in December of 2008 after getting so close to 1,500 yards that year:
“You know, London Fletcher played in the game and didn’t practice all week. All of the sudden it gets aggravating to [see me] standing on the sideline and you see me step into something and pick it up and understand what’s going on.”
“I was so mad I actually left the draft. After Carolina picked DeShaun Foster in the second round, I didn’t watch any more… … A lot of people thought I was going to be too wild, but to this day I’ve never gotten into trouble.”
Here are a few other typical Portis quotes:
“I used to do gymnastics. I almost made it to the Olympics, back in ’98, I think.”
“Going through my play book, I’m looking for the plays that can get me in the end zone, so I’m really trying hard. Actually my eyes haven’t been working that good.”
I think I brought more than just my athletic ability. I brought laughs. I brought joy. I brought a sense, an attitude and a swagger that is hard to find.”
People have been mailing stuff in. People . . . give me stuff. I had a guy bring me wigs, glasses, teeth, everything. I forgot the guy’s name, but I appreciate it.”
“I’ll be the Tasmanian Devil. If Shaun Alexander did great in this system, I’m sure I’ll be all right.”
Some of Portis' comments were serious and at those times, he generally wore his heart on his sleeve. About the win against the Minnesota Vikingsafter his great friend and Redskins’ safety Sean Taylor’s death in 2007, he said:
“I think once we got our angel up situated in heaven, he gave us all the strength in the world. Now guys go out and just play and have fun.”
There were times during the awful time surrounding Taylor’s death that Portis’ words helped a city hold it together in the face of a terrible tragedy, even as our hearts ached right along with his. For his strength and courage during that time, I thank him.
Players come and go and many of them find their way into fans’ hearts. In mine, C.P. will always be a Washington Redskin.
There are hundreds more Clinton Portis quotes that will stick in Redskins fans’ minds. Portis’ teammate and good friend Santana Moss knows the score when it comes to what his buddy says.
“You listen to anything Clinton says, you might fall for anything in life. Listen to him, you ain’t going nowhere."


Hail.